Biotechnology Home
Gene transfer to
plants by diverse species of bacteria: an open-source platform
for plant biotechnology
W. Broothaerts,
H.J. Mitchell, B.J. Weir, R.A. Jefferson
Since the
discovery in the 1970s that Agrobacterium tumefaciens is capable of
transferring genes to plants, it has become the most important tool in plant
biotechnology. It has also been widely considered that Agrobacterium
is the only bacterial genus with this capacity. Here we show that several
other genera of bacteria can be modified to mediate gene transfer to diverse
plant species. Three bacterial species from three genera and two families,
Rhizobium sp. NGR234, Sinorhizobium meliloti and
Mesorhizobium loti, were made competent for gene transfer by acquiring
both a modified, disarmed Ti plasmid and a binary vector. Stable
transformation of three plant species—tobacco, rice and Arabidopsis—was
achieved using these non-Agrobacterium species. Transformation was
performed with minor modifications of published protocols, using the
leaf disk method for tobacco, scutellum-derived callus for rice and floral
dip for Arabidopsis. The resulting plants expressed hygromycin
resistance and glucoronidase (GUS) activity, contained 1–3 copies of the
T-DNA as indicated by southern blot analysis, and showed the normal range of
T-DNA insertions into host genomes determined by the polymerase chain
reaction (PCR)–mediated sequencing of integration sites. To ensure that the
gene transfer did not result from contamination with Agrobacterium
cells, controls including species-specific PCR, selective plating, and use
of a tagged binary vector were implemented. Thus, diverse plant-associated
bacteria, when harbouring a disarmed Ti plasmid and binary vector (or
presumably a co-integrate or whole Ti plasmid), are readily able to transfer
T-DNA to plants. The Ti plasmid is self-transmissible, perhaps indicating
the existence of a ubiquitous natural mechanism effecting horizontal gene
transfer from bacteria to plants. If so, then much of the plant genomic DNA
sequence thus far determined, which seems bacterial in origin, may have
derived from such transfer over recent evolutionary time scales.
This alternative
to Agrobacterium-mediated technology may provide two distinct
advantages. First, it may lead to more effective plant transformation for
recalcitrant species or cell types, through use of natural bacterium–plant
interactions, for instance with benign epiphytic bacteria as vectors for
gene transfer. Second, the cumbersome patent thicket that surrounds
Agrobacterium gene transfer technology has rendered this tool largely
unusable for commercial purposes by most companies, institutions and
individuals. However, the patents in the thicket explicitly refer to and
claim Agrobacterium. Our observations will likely lead to a
comprehensive ‘work-around’ of these patents, as the species now capable of
gene transfer are decidedly distinct from Agrobacterium. This new
gene transfer technology will be freely available through a novel
open-source BIOS licence that will require sharing both improvements to the
core technology and relevant biosafety data. The technology will be improved
and further developed as a BioForge project—a new distributive,
Internet-mediated, cooperative research approach (Nature 431: 494, 2004;
www.bios.net). It is envisaged that this technology and the sharing paradigm
it reflects will help break the dominance of plant transformation by a few
multinational companies and will forge a highly cooperative and
public-spirited process of technology development. This step towards
independence from corporate control of enabling technology may foster
diverse applications of biotechnology to emerge with a focus on public good
and low-margin priorities typical of the needs of developing world
agriculture, production environments and economies.